COULD YOUTUBE BENEFIT SECONDARY EDUCATION’S ELT?

Authors

  • Anselmus Inharjanto Universitas Katolik Musi Charitas
  • Ega Leovani Universitas Katolik Musi Charitas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v6i2.153

Keywords:

authentic materials, English language teaching, secondary education, YouTube

Abstract

YouTube is definitely a digital platform that seems to be one of the most-used search engines nowadays. It offers an endless supply of authentic, real-life, up-to-date materials that may benefit English Language Teaching (ELT). This research aims to investigate to what extent the authentic materials through YouTube may benefit English Language Teaching of secondary education in Indonesia. This descriptive qualitative study employed questionnaires, classroom observations and textbook analysis as the data collection methods. A purposive sample of 125 XI graders of senior high school participated in this study. This primary research was followed by secondary one by reviewing recent literary works systematically. The results of the study suggest that Indonesian students seemingly need more exposure to English language and the advance of information and communication technologies (ICTs), particularly YouTube, is likely to foster English Language Teaching of secondary education in Indonesia since it provides abundant authentic materials related to real-life contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S. (2017). Authentic ELT materials in the language classroom: An overview. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 181-202. Retrieved on August 20, 2021, from http://www.jallr.com/

Ahsanu, M. (2017). Fostering EFL learner autonomy in Indonesian context. Issues in Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 1(1), 12-19. Retrieved on October 18, 2021, from https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/iallteach/article/view/98

Alias, N., Razak, S.H.A., elHadad, G., Noh, N.R.M. (2013). A content analysis in the studies of YouTube in selected journals. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 103, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.301.

Almurashi, W. A. (2016). The effective use of YouTube videos for teaching English language in classrooms as supplementary material at Taibah University in Alula. International Journal of English Language and Lingusitics Research, 4(3), 32–47. Retrieved on August 1, 2021, from http://www.eajournals.org/

Baugh, A. C., & Cable, T. (2013). A History of the English Language (6th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

British Council & BBC (2014). Teaching English. Retrieved on August 23, 2019, from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/knowledge-database/comprehensible-input

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. Oxon: Routledge.

Education First (2020). EF English proficiency index. Retrieved on November 10, 2020, from www.ef.com/epi

Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative Methods in Social Research. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Fleck, B.K.B, Beckman, L.M., Sterns, J.L & Hussey H.D. (2014). YouTube in the classroom: Helpful tips and student perceptions. Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(3), 21-37. Retrieved on August 3, 2021, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1060489

Friedman, D. A. (2012). How to collect and analyse qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.). Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide (pp. 180-195). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). London: Longman.

Holland, M. (2016). How YouTube developed into a successful platform for user-generated content. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 7(1), 52-59. Retrieved on September 16, 2021, from https://www.elon.edu/u/academics/communications/journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/153/2017/06/06_Margaret_Holland.pdf

Holliday, A. (2010). Analysing qualitative data. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.). Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 98-110). London: Continuum.

Husna, A. N., Purnawarman, P., Suherdi, D. & Lubis, A.H. (2019). YouTube® for the 21st century English language E-learning: What works and what doesn’t? 2nd International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE) Conference Paper. 222-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2IE47452.2019.8940857

Inharjanto, A & Lisnani (2021). ELT learning media for young learners: Family-themed picture stories. Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ), 7(1), 21-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v7i1.3987

Kachru, Y. & Nelson, C. L. (2006). World Englishes in Asian context. Hong Kong: University Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Larsen-Freeman, D & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larson, K. R. (2014). Critical Pedagogy(ies) for ELT in Indonesia. Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia (TEFLIN) Journal, 25 (1), 122-138. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v25i1/122-138

Leimgruber, J. R. E. (2013). Singapore English: Structure, variation, and usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Little, D. G. & Singleton, D. M. (1988). Authentic Materials and the Role of Fixed Support in Language Teaching: Towards a Manual for Language Learners. Dublin: Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Trinity College Dublin.

Little, D., Devitt, S. & Singleton, D. (1994). Learning foreign languages from authentic texts: Theory and practice. Dublin: Authentik

Maili, S.N. (2018). Bahasa Inggris pada Sekolah Dasar: Mengapa perlu dan mengapa dipersoalkan. Judika (Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika), 6(1), 23-28. Retrieved on October 10, 2020, from http: http://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/judika

Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative Researching (2nd ed.). Londong: Sage Publications.

McGarry, D. (1995). The role of authentic texts. Dublin: Authentik.

Mistar, J. (2005). Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) in Indonesia. In G. Braine (Ed.). Teaching English to the World: History, Curriculum, and Practice (pp. 71-80). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Musthafa, B. (2001). Communicative language teaching in Indonesia: Issues of theoretical assumptions and challenges in classroom practice. TEFLIN Journal, 12 (2), 184-193. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v12i2/184-193

Nasution, A.K.R. (2019). YouTube as a media in English Language Teaching (ELT) context: Teaching procedure text. Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education (UTAMAX), 1(1), 29-33. Retrieved on August 2, 2021, from http://ojs.journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/utamax

O’Sullivan, N. (1997). Teaching English in South-East Asia. London: In Print.

Pranoto, Y.H. & Inharjanto, A. (2020). Merevitalisasi penggunaan Bahasa Inggris pada satuan pendidikan. Jurnal Humanipreneur, 1(1), 1-7. Retrieved on November 20, 2020, from https://openjournal.ikdki.org/index.php/humanipreneur/article/view/7

Rachmawati, R. & Cahyani, F. (2020). The use of YouTube videos in improving non-English Department students’ pronunciation skills. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 3(2), 83-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.31538/alsuna.v3i2.916

Rahayu, S.P. & Putri, W.S. (2018). Uploading speaking assignment to YouTube channel as an effort in increasing student’s pronunciation skill. English Journal of Merdeka (EnJourMe), 3(2), 35-45. doi: 10.26905/enjourme.v2i2.2741

Richards K., Ross, S & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies. Abingdon: Routledge.

Romanowski, P. (2014). Can YouTube serve as an effective language tool for intercultural training in the digital era. Komunikacja Specjalistyczna, 8, 28-37. Retrieved on August 10, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303496654_Can_YouTube_serve_as_an_effective_language_tool_for_intercultural_training_in_the_digital_era

Ruschoff, B. (2010). Authenticity in language learning revisited: Materials, processes, Aims. In B. O’Rourke & L. Carson (Eds.), Language Learner Autonomy: Policy, Curriculum, Classroom (pp. 121-134). Oxford: Peter Lang.

Samosir, F.T., Pitasari, D.N., Purwaka & Tjahjono, P.E. (2018). Efektivitas Youtube sebagai media pembelajaran mahasiswa (Studi di Fakultas FISIP Universitas Bengkulu). Record and Library Journal, 4(2), 81-91. Retrieved on August 25, 2021, from https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/RLJ

Shimray, S.R & Ramaiah, C.K. (2019). Use of YouTube by students: A case study of Pondicherry University. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 56(3), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2019/v56i3/144112

Suryanta, N.H., Haryono & Khumaedi, M. (2018). The effect of the use of YouTube video media and conventional pictures on the result of remote kick exercise of extracurricular participants in SMP Islam Al-Bisyri Semarang. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 7(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.15294

Thornbury, S. (2001), How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd

Watkins, J. & Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 113–119. Retrieved on August 1, 2021, from https://leia.org/LEiA/LEiA%20VOLUMES/Download/LEiA_V2_I1_2011/LEiA_V2I1A09_Watkins_Wilkins.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-07-20

How to Cite

Inharjanto, A., & Leovani, E. (2022). COULD YOUTUBE BENEFIT SECONDARY EDUCATION’S ELT?. ELTR Journal, 6(2), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v6i2.153

Issue

Section

Articles